Re: [oauth] Increased CPU usage during device flow with libcurl 8.20.0
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, rmt@lists.postgresql.org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-06-17T15:40:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
[RMT hat] On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 05:02:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 1:40 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> However ... I don't love the plan of fixing this differently in v19 >>> and v20 just because of feature freeze. Exposing more information >>> for testing purposes isn't a user-visible feature IMO, so I would >>> rather we go straight to 0004. > >> Fair enough. If the RMT is okay with this for 19, were you thinking >> we'd also backpatch that code directly to 18? > > Sure. This seems like a reasonable plan to me. -- nathan
Commits
-
oauth: Skip call-count test for libcurl 8.20.0
- c5c35fd7c55c 18 (unreleased) landed
- fd5ea2e9e37c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
libpq-oauth: Print libcurl version with OAUTHDEBUG_UNSAFE_TRACE
- 357e4d64f871 18 (unreleased) landed
- 4bd477dcc619 19 (unreleased) landed