Re: 7.2.1. The FROM Clause
Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, jochen.bandhauer@gmx.net, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2026-06-15T20:35:37Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
Re: Tom Lane > I think we've discussed that before, and concluded that removing the > docs would be a disservice to users who are trying to read old code > that does this and don't know what it means. Maybe that argument > is too weak now to justify keeping the docs, but I'm unsure. Fwiw, I saw that syntax somewhere some days back and then went looking what it meant. I did find it in psql's "\h select" and in turn the full SELECT documentation. I guess if the docs had not mentioned it, I would have had to read the grammar, and looking for a non-string in there sounds painful. So it should definitely be kept. Thanks. :) Christoph
Commits
-
Doc: reword discussion of asterisk after table names in FROM.
- 8ebbf79a83e4 19 (unreleased) landed