Re: Fix unqualified catalog references in psql describe queries
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-06-10T01:57:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 09:08:50AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > Now I wonder if we shoud not "protect" the operators too. They could also > lead to wrong results (if not worst). Kind of true. Still we have been pretty lax about the operators as they also lead to less readable queries. There was one spot missing with string_agg() two lines down one of the pg_get_expr() changes. The spots for relation and function qualifications are worth addressing anyway, and consistent with the file style. Fixed the extra spot I have noticed, and applied the result on HEAD. -- Michael
Commits
-
psql: Add some missing schema qualifications in describe.c
- bf5206f00773 19 (unreleased) landed
-
SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
- 2f094e7ac691 19 (unreleased) cited
-
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION ... SERVER.
- 8185bb534763 19 (unreleased) cited