Horton
Menu

Thread

  1. Postgres 12 update to new major version

    Boris Dovčík <bdovcik@gmail.com> — 2026-06-05T12:11:12Z

    Hello all,

I have a question regarding the update of the production database (multiple
TB of data) from version 12 to higher major version. We would like to jump
to 15 or 16. DB is installed on a Linux server with one replica on another,
it is not on cloud.

First question is should we perform updates one by one? 12 -> 13 -> 14 etc.
or is it viable to jump to 16 right away? (We have few functions but
usually its plain tables)

Second we are contemplating options for the update since we are limited
with downtime. We could get 4 hours of downtime for the whole update
(either via pg_update or dumps). We are not sure how to estimate the time
for direct update or dumps. What would be the recommended way for it?

One option we see could be logical replication to the new major version on
a new machine, but we received feedback that in our setup it might not be
recommendable. Does it make sense to try logical replica? What would be the
downsides of it?

Best regards,
Boris Dovčík

  2. Re: Postgres 12 update to new major version

    Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> — 2026-06-05T20:08:31Z

    On Fri, Jun  5, 2026 at 02:11:12PM +0200, Boris Dovčík wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I have a question regarding the update of the production database (multiple TB
> of data) from version 12 to higher major version. We would like to jump to 15
> or 16. DB is installed on a Linux server with one replica on another, it is not
> on cloud.
> 
> First question is should we perform updates one by one? 12 -> 13 -> 14 etc. or
> is it viable to jump to 16 right away? (We have few functions but usually its
> plain tables)
> 
> Second we are contemplating options for the update since we are limited with
> downtime. We could get 4 hours of downtime for the whole update (either via
> pg_update or dumps). We are not sure how to estimate the time for direct update
> or dumps. What would be the recommended way for it?
> 
> One option we see could be logical replication to the new major version on a
> new machine, but we received feedback that in our setup it might not be
> recommendable. Does it make sense to try logical replica? What would be the
> downsides of it?

I think you want this web page:

	https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

  3. Re: Postgres 12 update to new major version

    Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> — 2026-06-05T20:30:55Z

    On 6/5/26 5:11 AM, Boris Dovčík wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I have a question regarding the update of the production database 
> (multiple TB of data) from version 12 to higher major version. We would 

How many TB?

> like to jump to 15 or 16. DB is installed on a Linux server with one 
> replica on another, it is not on cloud.

What replication is being done now?

Where are the servers relative to each other network distance wise?

> 
> First question is should we perform updates one by one? 12 -> 13 -> 14 
> etc. or is it viable to jump to 16 right away? (We have few functions 
> but usually its plain tables)
> 
> Second we are contemplating options for the update since we are limited 
> with downtime. We could get 4 hours of downtime for the whole update 
> (either via pg_update or dumps). We are not sure how to estimate the 

Did you mean pg_upgrade?

> time for direct update or dumps. What would be the recommended way for it?
> 
> One option we see could be logical replication to the new major version 
> on a new machine, but we received feedback that in our setup it might 

What was the feedback that indicated it was not advisable?

> not be recommendable. Does it make sense to try logical replica? What 
> would be the downsides of it?
> 
> Best regards,
> Boris Dovčík


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

  4. Re: Postgres 12 update to new major version

    Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> — 2026-06-05T21:59:20Z

    On Fri, 2026-06-05 at 14:11 +0200, Boris Dovčík wrote:
> I have a question regarding the update of the production database (multiple TB of data)
> from version 12 to higher major version. We would like to jump to 15 or 16. DB is installed
> on a Linux server with one replica on another, it is not on cloud.
> 
> First question is should we perform updates one by one? 12 -> 13 -> 14 etc. or is it
> viable to jump to 16 right away? (We have few functions but usually its plain tables)

You can jump over versions, but you should not upgrade to an old release like v15 or
v16.  Go to v18 or better.  It looks like you are not too eager to upgrade frequently,
otherwise you would not be on v12 today.  So I recommend that you put the time when
the next upgrade will be necessary as far into the future as possible.

> Second we are contemplating options for the update since we are limited with downtime.
> We could get 4 hours of downtime for the whole update (either via pg_update or dumps).
> We are not sure how to estimate the time for direct update or dumps. What would be the
> recommended way for it?

You should use pg_upgrade --link.  Then the upgrade can be a matter of minutes, unless
you have lots and lots of tables, functions or large objects.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

  5. Re: Postgres 12 update to new major version

    Jeff Ross <jross@openvistas.net> — 2026-06-05T22:38:25Z

    On 6/5/26 2:30 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:

> On 6/5/26 5:11 AM, Boris Dovčík wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have a question regarding the update of the production database 
>> (multiple TB of data) from version 12 to higher major version. We would 
>
> How many TB?
>
>> like to jump to 15 or 16. DB is installed on a Linux server with one 
>> replica on another, it is not on cloud.
>
> What replication is being done now?
>
> Where are the servers relative to each other network distance wise?
>
>>
>> First question is should we perform updates one by one? 12 -> 13 -> 
>> 14 etc. or is it viable to jump to 16 right away? (We have few 
>> functions but usually its plain tables)
>>
>> Second we are contemplating options for the update since we are 
>> limited with downtime. We could get 4 hours of downtime for the whole 
>> update (either via pg_update or dumps). We are not sure how to 
>> estimate the 
>
> Did you mean pg_upgrade?
>
>> time for direct update or dumps. What would be the recommended way 
>> for it?
>>
>> One option we see could be logical replication to the new major 
>> version on a new machine, but we received feedback that in our setup 
>> it might 
>
> What was the feedback that indicated it was not advisable?
>
>> not be recommendable. Does it make sense to try logical replica? What 
>> would be the downsides of it?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Boris Dovčík

I've got just a little over 1 TB in prod with a logical replica in the 
same network.

We upgraded from 10 to 16 in one jump by first setting up the logical 
replica to run 16 and getting replication up and in sync.

When it came time to do the upgrade from 10 to 16 it was just a few 
simple steps, and with minimal (less than 5 minutes downtime):

     Stop the pgbouncers, which stopped all network traffic

     Set the sequences on the 16 replica

     Updated pgbouncer configs to point to the 16 server

     Turned the pgbouncers back on

Setting the sequences was the most time consuming part but it was really 
not long.

Logical replication did the trick for us.

I see that in 19 we won't even have to set the sequences because they 
are also replicated!  Hooray!

One of the advantages to the logical replication route is that we could 
take advantage of testing a ton of our code against 16 on the replica 
*before* we ever flipped the switch.

Jeff

P.S.  I can't wait to hear how I did it all wrong or could have done it 
better but this absolutely worked ;-)