Horton

Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

View thread
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133@gmail.com>, Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
Date: 2026-05-29T22:25:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2026-May-27, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) wrote:

> I tried a bit, and the test complexity and speed (< 1s) appear to be within
> acceptable limits. I'm attaching 0002 as a reference test.
> 
> 0001 remains unchanged.

Pushed 0001, in two parts.  I rewrote the comment in
decode_concurrent_changes() though, hope it ended up okay.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Los cuentos de hadas no dan al niño su primera idea sobre los monstruos.
Lo que le dan es su primera idea de la posible derrota del monstruo."
                                                   (G. K. Chesterton)