Thread
-
Improve PQauthDataHook_type docs
Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> — 2026-04-19T15:54:02Z
Hello, In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/libpq-oauth.html#LIBPQ-OAUTH-AUTHDATA-HOOKS it is not entirely clear that `hook_fn` is the definition of the `PQauthDataHook_type` used in the functions signature, because the name is not used elsewhere. The function signatures refer to the typedef but the typedef is not shown. Using https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/libpq-notice-processing.html#LIBPQ-NOTICE-PROCESSING as a guideline I suggest to show the typedef of the callback rather than the `hook_fn` example, so that the `PQauthDataHook_type` name can be searched for. Please check the patch attached. Cheers -- Daniele
-
Re: Improve PQauthDataHook_type docs
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> — 2026-05-11T23:07:57Z
On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 04:54:02PM +0100, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: > Hello, > > In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/libpq-oauth.html#LIBPQ-OAUTH-AUTHDATA-HOOKS > it is not entirely clear that `hook_fn` is the definition of the > `PQauthDataHook_type` used in the functions signature, because the > name is not used elsewhere. The function signatures refer to the > typedef but the typedef is not shown. > > Using https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/libpq-notice-processing.html#LIBPQ-NOTICE-PROCESSING > as a guideline I suggest to show the typedef of the callback rather > than the `hook_fn` example, so that the `PQauthDataHook_type` name can > be searched for. > > Please check the patch attached. > Use the typedef name to make it easier to correlate to the functions > using this type definition. > --- > doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml > index e50f0cbd8c7..f646244840d 100644 > --- a/doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml > @@ -10280,7 +10280,7 @@ void PQsetAuthDataHook(PQauthDataHook_type hook); > default handler will be reinstalled. Otherwise, the application passes > a pointer to a callback function with the signature: > <programlisting> > -int hook_fn(PGauthData type, PGconn *conn, void *data); > +typedef int (*PQauthDataHook_type) (PGauthData type, PGconn *conn, void *data); > </programlisting> > which <application>libpq</application> will call when an action is > required of the application. <replaceable>type</replaceable> describes I looked at this, and I think using a typedef makes it too complicated. The idea is that "hook" should be a pointer to a function that has this definition. Maybe we should change it to: int hook(PGauthData type, PGconn *conn, void *data); ---- to match the line above: void PQsetAuthDataHook(PQauthDataHook_type hook); -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.