Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-05-11T21:42:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 12:40:38PM +0700, John Naylor wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 8:19 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Hi Bruce, thanks for you work on this. Here are some comments: > > > Allow C++ compiler mode to be used with ICU (John Naylor) § > > That was just for our headerscheck and I'd be surprised if it mattered > for extension authors. Also, a later commit af2d4ca191 got rid of > including ICU headers in our local headers entirely, so that > supersedes the above anyway. Great, removed. > > Optionally use AVX2 CPU instructions for calculating page checksums (Matthew Sterrett, Andrew Kim) § > > > Optionally use ARM Crypto Extension to Compute CRC32C (John Naylor) § > > There's no option for these, the extensions are used where available. So, the "Optionally" indicates we use these instructions if the CPU supports them. I assume we don't use them on all CPUs. Can you suggest better wording? > > Improve sort performance using radix sorts (John Naylor) § > > Minor quibble: I think it's more normal to refer to "sort" as a > non-count noun, when talking about a technique. Done. > > Improve performance of numeric operations on platforms without 128-bit integer support (Dean Rasheed) § > > The intent was a more of a simplification/refactoring. Server > platforms without 128-bit integer support are few and far between > (e.g. S390X on some broken versions of clang, which I tested out of > curiosity). Okay, removed. > > Change index access method handlers to use a static IndexAmRoutines structure, rather than dynamically allocated ones (Matthias van de Meent) § > > > > This is a backwardly incompatible. > > I understand this whole section to be about incompatibilities -- if > there was a follow-up mention here, it seems to have been lost along > the way. Okay, I have removed "This is a backwardly incompatible.", which I think was your point. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.