Re: Virtual generated columns

Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-02-04T22:36:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Expand virtual generated columns for ALTER COLUMN TYPE

  2. Eliminate code duplication in replace_rte_variables callbacks

  3. Expand virtual generated columns in the planner

  4. Virtual generated columns

  5. Additional tests for stored generated columns

  6. Improve generated_stored test

  7. Fix handling of CREATE DOMAIN with GENERATED constraint syntax

  8. Add pg_constraint rows for not-null constraints

  9. Put generated_stored test objects in a schema

  10. Rename regress test generated to generated_stored

  11. Small code simplification

  12. Remove useless code

  13. Remove useless initializations

  14. doc: Clarify that pg_attrdef also stores generation expressions

  15. Clean out column-level pg_init_privs entries when dropping tables.

  16. Re-implement the ereport() macro using __VA_ARGS__.

Attachments

On 27.01.25 13:42, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 09:59, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>>
>> Here is an updated patch that integrates the above changes and also
>> makes some adjustments now that the logical replication configuration
>> questions are resolved.  I think this is complete now.
>>
> 
> In struct ResultRelInfo, the following field is added:
> 
>      int         ri_NumGeneratedNeededI;
>      int         ri_NumGeneratedNeededU;
> 
> +   /* true if the above have been computed */
> +   bool        ri_Generated_valid;
> +
> 
> but that doesn't really seem to be accurate, because it's set to true
> by ExecInitGenerated() whether it's called with CMD_INSERT or
> CMD_UPDATE, so it will be true before both the other fields are
> computed. It's used from ExecGetExtraUpdatedCols() as an indicator
> that ri_extraUpdatedCols is valid, but it looks like that might not be
> the case, if ExecInitGenerated() was only called with CMD_INSERT.
> 
> I'm not sure if that represents an actual bug, but it looks wrong. It
> should perhaps be called "ri_extraUpdatedCols_valid", and only set to
> true when ExecInitGenerated() is called with CMD_UPDATE, and
> ri_extraUpdatedCols is populated.

Yeah, this is quite contorted.  I have renamed it like you suggested.