Re: LLVM 22
Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>, Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Date: 2026-03-13T13:36:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On Sun, 2026-01-11 at 20:09 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > A new unrelated assertion started firing in LLVM main/22 a few days > ago: > > v_nullbytemask = l_int8_const(lc, 1 << ((attnum) & 0x07)); > Assertion failed: (llvm::isUIntN(BitWidth, val) && "Value is not > an N-bit unsigned value") > > Here is a fix for that. Fedora pushed 22.1.0 to both Fedora 44 beta and rawhide repos, so I tested these patches. Builds are fine and all regression tests pass. Anything else I should check? Regards, -- Devrim Gündüz Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor BlueSky: @devrim.gunduz.org , @gunduz.org
Commits
-
jit: No backport::SectionMemoryManager for LLVM 22.
- 9b354cfc5584 14.23 landed
- 963fccc09cc6 15.18 landed
- 8354cd7ff575 16.14 landed
- 0a2291b59f9b 17.10 landed
- 5c54e0f48fa2 18.4 landed
- be21341e13d9 19 (unreleased) landed
-
jit: Stop emitting lifetime.end for LLVM 22.
- b4e7cd428c00 14.23 landed
- c00ea2b5b4f1 15.18 landed
- 26f27c592c5d 16.14 landed
- b6d0cddbe27d 17.10 landed
- 78cea19bf7da 18.4 landed
- de6b80e5ff4b 19 (unreleased) landed