Thread

  1. Re: Prepping for annual pgindent run

    Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2026-05-06T14:54:54Z

    On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 02:39:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
    > One thing to be done is to update src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list
    > from the canonical list constructed by the buildfarm.  We've been
    > pretty good about maintaining that file manually, but not perfect,
    > so this has a few small effects --- see attached for what that
    > would look like today.
    
    Seems fine.
    
    > I also propose applying the pgindent patches discussed in [1] and [2],
    > which would have rather larger effects.  [1] improves formatting of
    > multiline comment blocks.  99% of the changes it would cause look like
    
    In general, +1.
    
    > @@ -933,7 +933,8 @@ _PG_init(void)
    >  	MarkGUCPrefixReserved("isn");
    >  }
    >  
    > -/* isn_out
    > +/*
    > + * isn_out
    >   */
    >  PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(isn_out);
    >  Datum
    > 
    > While that's not that big a deal, it improves style uniformity since
    > most of our multiline comments do not have any text on the first line.
    
    Yeah, this seems like a good change, provided we've minimized all the
    unintended side-effects.  I know there was some discussion about whether
    this change should be made in the Perl script, but I really can't blame
    anyone for not touching the pg_bsd_indent source code.
    
    > [2] adds a space between comma and an immediately following period,
    > which mostly affects variadic functions:
    > 
    > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ px_set_debug_handler(void (*handler) (const char *))
    >  }
    >  
    >  void
    > -px_debug(const char *fmt,...)
    > +px_debug(const char *fmt, ...)
    >  {
    >  	va_list		ap;
    > 
    > 
    > It also helps a few struct constructors:
    > 
    > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct RBTree
    >  
    >  static RBTNode sentinel =
    >  {
    > -	.color = RBTBLACK,.left = RBTNIL,.right = RBTNIL,.parent = NULL
    > +	.color = RBTBLACK, .left = RBTNIL, .right = RBTNIL, .parent = NULL
    >  };
    > 
    > I don't see any places where it makes anything worse, and the
    > improvement in variadic functions is quite pleasing IMO.
    > So I think we should do that too.
    
    I read through that patch and it LGTM.
    
    -- 
    nathan