Thread
-
Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2026-05-07T21:28:09Z
On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 04:12:09PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 03:41:56PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> +/* >> + * We can only define TAS_SPIN if TAS was defined. Otherwise, the platform >> + * defined its own S_LOCK without TAS, and therefore is responsible for >> + * defining its own TAS_SPIN as well. (Note that we currently do not have any >> + * platforms that don't define TAS.) >> + */ >> #if !defined(TAS_SPIN) >> +#if defined(TAS) >> #define TAS_SPIN(lock) TAS(lock) >> -#endif /* TAS_SPIN */ >> +#else >> +#error Neither TAS nor TAS_SPIN defined on this platform. Please report this to pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org. >> +#endif /* TAS */ >> +#endif /* ! TAS_SPIN */ > > Wait, this isn't right. TAS_SPIN is only used by s_lock(), which is only > used by the default S_LOCK. We should just not compile s_lock() if the > platform defines its own S_LOCK, and we shouldn't #error here if TAS is not > defined. Should be fixed in v5, sorry for the noise. -- nathan