Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>,
Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>,
"Moon, Insung" <Moon_Insung_i3@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-08T15:56:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revamp the WAL record format.
- 2c03216d8311 9.5.0 cited
On 2019-07-08 17:47, Stephen Frost wrote: > Of course, we can discuss if what websites do with over-the-wire > encryption is sensible to compare to what we want to do in PG for > data-at-rest, but then we shouldn't be talking about what websites do, > it'd make more sense to look at other data-at-rest encryption systems > and consider what they're doing. So, how do encrypted file systems do it? Are there any encrypted file systems in general use that allow encrypting only some files or encrypting different parts of the file system with different keys, or any of those other granular approaches being discussed? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services