Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements
Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru>
From: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru>
To: Andrei Zubkov <zubkov@moonset.ru>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-10-26T21:16:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Improve quoting in some error messages
- 07e5e6674233 14.0 cited
On 25.10.2023 18:35, Andrei Zubkov wrote: > Hi Alena, > > On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 16:25 +0300, Alena Rybakina wrote: >> Hi! Thank you for your work on the subject. >> 1. I didn't understand why we first try to find pgssEntry with a >> false top_level value, and later find it with a true top_level value. > In case of pg_stat_statements the top_level field is the bool field of > the pgssHashKey struct used as the key for pgss_hash hashtable. When we > are performing a reset only userid, dbid and queryid values are > provided. We need to reset both top-level and non-top level entries. We > have only one way to get them all from a hashtable - search for entries > having top_level=true and with top_level=false in their keys. Thank you for explanation, I got it. >> 2. And honestly, I think you should change >> "Remove the entry if it exists, starting with the non-top-level >> entry." on >> "Remove the entry or reset min/max time statistic information and >> the timestamp if it exists, starting with the non-top-level entry." >> And the same with the comment bellow: >> "Also reset the top-level entry if it exists." >> "Also remove the entry or reset min/max time statistic information >> and the timestamp if it exists." > There are four such places actually - every time when the > SINGLE_ENTRY_RESET macro is used. The logic of reset performed is > described a bit in this macro definition. It seems quite redundant to > repeat this description four times. But I've noted that "remove" terms > should be replaced by "reset". > > I've attached v24 with commits updated. Yes, I agree with the changes. -- Regards, Alena Rybakina