Re: test: avoid redundant standby catchup in 049_wait_for_lsn

On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 08:25:35PM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
> The change preserves the same coverage while removing one redundant
> replay catch-up on the delayed standby. It appears to reduce the test
> runtime by about 7 seconds, though I have looked into why much of the
> improvement comes from this change alone.

Alexander may think differently and remove that, but I disagree.  The
test is clearly written so as we want two wait checks to happen, for
for CREATE FUNCTION, and one for CREATE PROCEDURE.  Removing the first
check to keep only the second one removes its meaning.  In short, I
see nothing wrong to deal with here.
--
Michael