Thread
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix some memory leaks in the WAL receiver
- b801d5eef17f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor libpqwalreceiver
- 78c8c814390f 10.0 cited
-
[PATCH] Fix memory leak of primary_sysid in walreceiver
DaeMyung Kang <charsyam@gmail.com> — 2026-04-26T17:01:30Z
Hi, Hackers, In WalReceiverMain(), the outer streaming loop calls walrcv_identify_system() once per iteration to verify the primary's system identifier: primary_sysid = walrcv_identify_system(wrconn, &primaryTLI); ... if (strcmp(primary_sysid, standby_sysid) != 0) ereport(ERROR, ...); walrcv_identify_system() (libpqrcv_identify_system() in libpqwalreceiver.c) returns a pstrdup()'d string, but the caller never frees it. Each streaming restart therefore leaks the string. The error path is unaffected because the surrounding memory context is reset on ERROR. The attached patch adds a pfree(primary_sysid) right after the comparison. This dates back to commit 78c8c814390 ("Refactor libpqwalreceiver", 2016), so it should be a back-patch candidate as well. No new tests are added; the fix only releases resources and does not change observable behavior. `make check` and the streaming replication TAP test (src/test/recovery/t/001_stream_rep.pl) pass with the patch applied. Patch attached. Regards, DaeMyung Kang -
Re: [PATCH] Fix memory leak of primary_sysid in walreceiver
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2026-04-27T00:36:55Z
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 02:01:30AM +0900, DaeMyung Kang wrote: > The attached patch adds a pfree(primary_sysid) right after the > comparison. My first impression was that it does not matter because I was under the impression that this code path is only reached once, but that's not the case: a WAL receiver could stay around waiting for instructions before retrying a connection. I doubt that this is worth bothering for in the back branches, as it just means a small leak each time we switch to a new TLI repeatedly, something that would matter mostly for a cascading standby where we don't want to change the connection point (a SIGHUP'd primary_conninto enforces a WAL receiver shutdown). Let's clean up on HEAD, though. -- Michael