Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2026-04-10T13:27:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 01:31:38PM +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote: > On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 at 22:55, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > I'd be interested in feedback about how high folks value different aspects: > > My thoughts below. > > > 1) CI software can be self hosted > > > > E.g. to prevent at least the cfbot case from being unpredictably abandoned > > again. > > Low, I personally don't want to manage self hosting it. Self-hosted > software can just as easily be abandoned. i.e. I'd expect GitHub > Actions to outlive underfunded open source CI software. Uh, I actually think the opposite. while proprietary software doesn't disappear, it seems to become obsolete (underfunded development) or prohibitively expensive sooner than open source. The dataase industry has certainly shown that in the past 30 years. Also, four months ago Github wanted to charge for self-hosted actions, which supports "prohibitively expensive": https://www.reddit.com/r/devops/comments/1po8hj5/github_actions_introducing_a_perminute_fee_for/ -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
ci: Add GitHub Actions based CI
- 9c126063b19a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
ci: Remove support for cirrus-ci based CI
- 68c8a365d4dc 19 (unreleased) landed