Re: chained transactions
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-11-28T20:58:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v3-0001-Transaction-chaining.patch (text/plain)
On 04/11/2018 12:20, Fabien COELHO wrote: > Shouldn't psql tab completion be updated as well? Done. (I only did the AND CHAIN, not the AND NO CHAIN.) > I must admit that do not like much the three global variables & > Save/Restore functions. I'd suggest saving directly into 3 local variables > in function CommitTransactionCommand, and restoring them when needed. Code > should not be longer. I'd would not bother to skip saving when not > chaining. We're also using those functions in the 0002 patch. Should we just repeat the code three times, or use macros? > Copying & comparing nodes are updated. Should making, outing and reading > nodes also be updated? TransactionStmt isn't covered by the node serialization functions, so I didn't see anything to update. What did you have in mind? > About the tests: I'd suggest to use more options on the different tests, > eg SERIALIZABLE, READ ONLY… Also ISTM that tests should show > transaction_read_only value as well. OK, updated a bit. (Using READ ONLY doesn't work because then you can't write anything inside the transaction.) Updated patch attached. The previous (v2) patch apparently didn't apply anymore. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Transaction chaining
- 280a408b48d5 12.0 landed
-
Turn transaction_isolation into GUC enum
- f8c10f616fa5 12.0 landed