Re: table AM option passing

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>

To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>

Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2026-03-17T20:04:08Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 08:47:22PM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> Does anybody oppose changing table_tuple_insert() to use bits32 instead
> of integer for the 'options' argument?

No objections here.

-- 
nathan

Commits

Give an 'options' parameter to tuple_delete/_update
- db89a47115f0 19 (unreleased) landed
Fix vicinity of tuple_insert to use uint32, not int, for options
- ec2f81766ad7 19 (unreleased) landed
Have table_insert and siblings use an unsigned type for options
- 1bd6f22f43ac 19 (unreleased) landed
Remove the following unused type definitions: bool8, bool16, bool32, word8,
- ca7a1f0c8684 8.0.0 cited