Re: pg_receivewal documentation
Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>
From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-19T17:01:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 7/18/19 9:09 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> pg_receivewal -D /tmp/wal -S replica1 --synchronous -h localhost -p 5432 -U >> repluser -W >> psql -c 'SELECT * FROM pg_stat_replication;' postgres >> psql -c 'SELECT * FROM pg_replication_slots;' postgres >> psql -c 'CREATE DATABASE test' postgres >> >> In what scenarios do you see 'on' working ? > > Because the code says so, "on" is an alias for "remote_flush" (which > is not user-visible by the way): > src/include/access/xact.h:#define SYNCHRONOUS_COMMIT_ON > SYNCHRONOUS_COMMIT_REMOTE_FLUSH > > And if you do that it works fine (pg_receivewal --synchronous runs in > the background and I created a dummy table): > =# SELECT application_name, sync_state, flush_lsn, replay_lsn FROM > pg_stat_replication; > application_name | sync_state | flush_lsn | replay_lsn > ------------------+------------+-----------+------------ > pg_receivewal | sync | 0/15E1F88 | null > (1 row) > =# set synchronous_commit to on ; > SET > =# insert into aa values (2); > INSERT 0 1 > I forgot to use pg_receivewal -d with application_name instead of -h -p -U. Maybe we should have an explicit option for that, but that is a separate thread. Best regards, Jesper
Commits
-
Doc: Clarify interactions of pg_receivexlog with remote_apply
- 4a25ed16400c 9.6.15 landed
-
Doc: Clarify interactions of pg_receivewal with remote_apply
- 1c423463e4b9 10.10 landed
- 059e22693b23 11.5 landed
- a15a40aaaedf 12.0 landed
- fd7d387e0548 13.0 landed