Horton

Re: Consistent coding for the naming of LR workers

Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-07-13T11:27:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 13.07.23 11:29, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2023-Jul-13, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
>> I suppose we could just say "logical replication worker" in all cases. That
>> should be enough precision for the purpose of these messages.
> 
> Agreed.  IMO the user doesn't care about specifics.

Ok, committed.

Commits

  1. Fix untranslatable log message assembly