Re: Improve verification of recovery_target_timeline GUC.

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: David Steele <david@pgbackrest.org>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-02-20T03:38:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 03:25:30AM +0000, David Steele wrote:
> I noticed that when you replaced UINT_MAX with PG_UINT32_MAX you missed one
> instance. Fixed in the attached.

Added pgsql-hackers in CC for awareness, with your proposed patch
attached, David.

It looks so.  Will fix, thanks!
--
Michael

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix constant in error message for recovery_target_timeline

  2. Improve checks for GUC recovery_target_timeline