Re: Use correct macro for accessing offset numbers.
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Cc: Roman Khapov <rkhapov@yandex-team.ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-01-11T23:23:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 04:58:39PM +0500, Kirill Reshke wrote: > Maybe, I have stopped some more cases, in v2-0001 Right. It's true that we could be more consistent for all these based on their base type, some of them, particularly in the GIN code now, caring about using the correct macro. It may be a good occasion to double-check the whole tree for similar holes based on unsigned types. -- Michael
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Adjust some incorrect *GetDatum() macros
- ac59a90bef45 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Use more consistent *GetDatum() macros for some unsigned numbers
- 6dcfac9696cb 19 (unreleased) landed