Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2025-10-30T21:02:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add rudimentary table prioritization to autovacuum.
- d7965d65fc5b 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Trigger more frequent autovacuums with relallfrozen
- 06eae9e6218a 18.0 cited
-
Harden nbtree page deletion.
- c34787f91058 14.0 cited
-
Check for interrupts inside the nbtree page deletion code.
- 3a01f68e35a3 12.0 cited
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 04:05:19PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Are you planning to do some practical experimentation with this? I > feel like it would be a good idea to set up some kind of a test case > where this is expected to provide a benefit and see if it actually > does; and also maybe set up a test case where it will reorder the > tables but with no practical difference in the outcome expected and > verify that, in fact, nothing changes. Yes. I've been thinking through how I want to test this but have yet to actually do so. If you have ideas, I'm all ears. -- nathan