Thread
Commits
-
Fix type of infomask parameter in htup_details.h functions.
- d10866f1fdf1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert macros to static inline functions (htup_details.h, itup.h)
- 34694ec888d6 18.0 cited
-
fix type of infomask parameter in static inline functions
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2025-10-22T20:04:11Z
I noticed that a couple of the functions added by commit 34694ec use "int16" instead of "uint16" for the infomask parameter. I don't think there are any live bugs here, but IMHO we should at least fix this for v19 to help prevent future problems. Assuming there is agreement on this change, any thoughts on back-patching? -- nathan
-
Re: fix type of infomask parameter in static inline functions
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2025-10-22T21:16:54Z
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes: > I noticed that a couple of the functions added by commit 34694ec use > "int16" instead of "uint16" for the infomask parameter. I don't think > there are any live bugs here, but IMHO we should at least fix this for v19 > to help prevent future problems. > Assuming there is agreement on this change, any thoughts on back-patching? +1 for changing, but -1 for back-patching. Unless you're itching for reasons to update .abi-compliance-history. But if there's no live bug, that seems like make-work. regards, tom lane
-
Re: fix type of infomask parameter in static inline functions
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> — 2025-10-22T21:48:34Z
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 05:16:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > +1 for changing, but -1 for back-patching. Unless you're itching > for reasons to update .abi-compliance-history. But if there's no > live bug, that seems like make-work. Yeah, makes sense. Committed, thanks for looking. -- nathan