Horton

Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats()

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>, Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315@gmail.com>, pg@bowt.ie, andrew@dunslane.net, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-10-20T16:46:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 10:39:19AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> OK, I pushed a placeholder following Nathan's formatting proposal.
> The ABI checker should still complain, because I made it point at
> REL_18_0^, which is what I expect we'd do in practice.  After we
> see it respond to that, we can move the reference point to where
> it needs to be.

Thanks.  Here's a new patch set.  The v18 patch is just an update to the
.abi-compliance-history file that Tom committed.  The master patch adds
instructions for generating the file to RELEASE_NOTES.  I imagine we'll
want to add .abi-compliance-history files for the back-branches, too
(except for perhaps v13, which is about to go out of support in a couple
weeks).

-- 
nathan

Commits

  1. Add commit 24f6c1bd4 to v17 .abi-compliance-history.

  2. Add .abi-compliance-history to back-branches.

  3. Add reminder to create .abi-compliance-history.

  4. Update .abi-compliance-history file.

  5. Add .abi-compliance-history to v18 branch.

  6. Fix thinko in commit 7d129ba54.

  7. Fix lookups in pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats().

  8. Add defenses against unexpected changes in the NodeTag enum list.