Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-08-29T16:02:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 05:53:23PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote: >> I think this patch set will require reworking the "GetNamedLWLockTranche >> crashes on Windows in normal backend" patch [0], but AFAICT we can easily >> adjust it to scan through NamedLWLockTrancheNames instead. > > Except, we will need to turn the char**NamedLWLockTranche into a struct > that will hold the num_lwlocks as well. Something like. But that is doable. Ah, right. > If there is no interest to backpatch [0], maybe we should just make this > change as part of this patch set. What do you think? I can make this change > in v18. I think we should keep that separate. I don't see any benefit to combining it, and it'd be good to keep the discussion in a single thread in the archives for future reference. -- nathan
Commits
-
test_dsa: Avoid leaking LWLock tranches.
- c5c74282f2ea 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized entry.
- b26d76f64327 18.2 landed
- ac2800ddc185 17.8 landed
- 1165a933aab1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add a test harness for the LWLock tranche code.
- 16607718c010 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Revert recent change to RequestNamedLWLockTranche().
- d814d7fc3d52 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move dynamically-allocated LWLock tranche names to shared memory.
- 38b602b0289f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Prepare DSM registry for upcoming changes to LWLock tranche names.
- 5487058b56e0 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add GetNamedDSA() and GetNamedDSHash().
- fe07100e82b0 19 (unreleased) cited