Re: ReplicationSlotRelease() crashes when the instance is in the single user mode
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Cc: 'Paul A Jungwirth' <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>, Mutaamba Maasha <maasha@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-08-19T11:17:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 10:26:22AM +0000, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote: > I added a first version of the test. It could work on my env (Linux). You could also validate that using the CI, assuming that you have a cloned repo on github with the CI enabled. See src/tools/ci/README. I use that a lot with local branches for pre-commit validations where things could break across the board. > Since I cannot come up the appropriate place, I introduced new test file in > recovery test. creating/dropping/advancing a slot, and doing a logical decoding > is tested. Since standby mode is not supported by the single-user instance, > I did not test the slot synchronization. I have not known that. Hmm. src/test/modules/test_misc/ makes more sense to me here. (No need to send an updated patch just for that.) > IIUC, 0001 can be backpatched for all supported branches. I will create for them > after patch would be a good shape. Thanks, I'll check all that tomorrow. -- Michael
Commits
-
Fix assertion failure with replication slot release in single-user mode
- 8ed079cad824 13.23 landed
- 32d388d00f9f 14.20 landed
- 818be9b73c94 15.15 landed
- fea1cc3f75ff 16.11 landed
- 07a302387176 17.7 landed
- ea1c6b0b0aec 18.0 landed
- 1f2e51e3c7c2 19 (unreleased) landed