Re: BUG #18964: `ALTER DATABASE ... RESET ...` fails to reset extension parameters that no longer exist
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, mert@futo.org, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-07-28T21:15:04Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow resetting unknown custom GUCs with reserved prefixes.
- f79ca73d75cb 15.14 landed
- b998ce3272ab 16.10 landed
- 9eb6068fb64c 19 (unreleased) landed
- 7b9674a8b180 18.0 landed
- 39ff056365e4 17.6 landed
-
Allow ALTER SYSTEM to set unrecognized custom GUCs.
- 2d870b4aeff1 17.0 cited
-
Disallow setting bogus GUCs within an extension's reserved namespace.
- 88103567cb8f 15.0 cited
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 09:15:17AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 11:06:57PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote: >> Anyway, I'll mark the patch as "ready for committer". > > Thanks. I'd like to get this fixed in the August releases, so I'm planning > to commit this sometime late next week, barring additional feedback or > objections. I looked into how easily this back-patched to v15 (where commit 88103567c was added), and I noticed that the ALTER SYSTEM code looks a bit different on v15 and v16. Furthermore, I didn't see a simple way to fix it on those versions without first back-patching commit 2d870b4. From the commit message, it looks like Tom didn't back-patch it at the time due to a lack of complaints. I'm currently thinking we should first back-patch that one to at least v15, if not all supported versions, before applying my proposed patch. Thoughts? -- nathan