Thread
Commits
-
Fix incompatibility with libxml2 >= 2.14
- e688cfc2bce1 13.22 landed
- ac166b19a171 14.19 landed
- 75c1eb60b2cc 15.14 landed
- d24a96ce2cdb 16.10 landed
- c911e7802e1d 17.6 landed
- 8d1071e7da30 18.0 landed
- 8aa54aa7eefb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix deprecation warning with libxml2 2.14 in contrib/xml2/
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2025-07-04T04:03:01Z
Hi all, A colleague, Walid Abrahim, has reported that contrib/xml2/ gives a deprecation warning when attempting to compile xpath.c with upstream libxml2 2.14 (just checkout the top of branch 2.14): xpath.c: In function ‘pgxmlNodeSetToText’: xpath.c:212:17: warning: ‘content’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] 212 | result = xmlStrdup(buf->content); | ^~~~~~ In file included from /home/pooh/stable/libxml/2.14/include/libxml/parser.h:16, from /home/pooh/stable/libxml/2.14/include/libxml/tree.h:17, from /home/pooh/stable/libxml/2.14/include/libxml/xpath.h:27, from xpath.c:19: /home/pooh/stable/libxml/2.14/include/libxml/tree.h:103:14: note: declared here 103 | xmlChar *content XML_DEPRECATED_MEMBER; | ^~~~~~~ This is caused by the following commit, where upstream is deciding that we should not directly look at the "content" field of an xmlBuffer: https://github.com/GNOME/libxml2/commit/b34dc1e4 The solution is simple: we need to replace buf->content by a call to xmlBufferContent(). This routine exists since be803967dbec (year 2000), so 25 years should make that safe enough to use. The last batch of libxml deprecation warning fixes we have done was last year in [1], so the one we have here is new. It seems to me that it would not hurt to just backpatch that all the way down rather than waiting. Comments are welcome. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1012981.1713222862@sss.pgh.pa.us Regards, -- Michael -
Re: Fix deprecation warning with libxml2 2.14 in contrib/xml2/
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2025-07-04T04:36:33Z
On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 01:03:01PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > A colleague, Walid Abrahim, has reported that contrib/xml2/ gives a Oops, Walid Ibrahim. Sorry for the mistake. -- Michael
-
Re: Fix deprecation warning with libxml2 2.14 in contrib/xml2/
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2025-07-04T04:44:56Z
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > The solution is simple: we need to replace buf->content by a call to > xmlBufferContent(). This routine exists since be803967dbec (year > 2000), so 25 years should make that safe enough to use. > The last batch of libxml deprecation warning fixes we have done was > last year in [1], so the one we have here is new. It seems to me that > it would not hurt to just backpatch that all the way down rather than > waiting. Comments are welcome. Seems reasonable. regards, tom lane
-
Re: Fix deprecation warning with libxml2 2.14 in contrib/xml2/
Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de> — 2025-07-04T07:12:33Z
On 04.07.25 06:03, Michael Paquier wrote: > The solution is simple: we need to replace buf->content by a call to > xmlBufferContent(). This routine exists since be803967dbec (year > 2000), so 25 years should make that safe enough to use. > > The last batch of libxml deprecation warning fixes we have done was > last year in [1], so the one we have here is new. It seems to me that > it would not hurt to just backpatch that all the way down rather than > waiting. Comments are welcome. +1 -- Jim
-
Re: Fix deprecation warning with libxml2 2.14 in contrib/xml2/
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2025-07-07T00:20:05Z
On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 12:44:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> The last batch of libxml deprecation warning fixes we have done was >> last year in [1], so the one we have here is new. It seems to me that >> it would not hurt to just backpatch that all the way down rather than >> waiting. Comments are welcome. > > Seems reasonable. Thanks, applied. -- Michael