Re: A assert failure when initdb with track_commit_timestamp=on
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213@163.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-07-08T11:26:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Disable commit timestamps during bootstrap
- 8bca4476f9f9 13.22 landed
- b61ddcaf41cf 14.19 landed
- dcbbd43317c0 15.14 landed
- 7e7059abfd22 16.10 landed
- ae20c105f0b2 17.6 landed
- 29a4b63c6bc8 18.0 landed
- 5a6c39b6df33 19 (unreleased) landed
On Sat, Jul 05, 2025 at 02:00:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Here's a fleshed-out implementation of Hayato-san's idea. I've > not done anything about reverting 5a6c39b6d, nor have I done any > checks to see if there are other GUCs we ought to mark similarly. > (But at this point I'd be prepared to bet that there are.) I've been reading through the patch (not tested), and no objections with the concept here. I would have kept that a HEAD-only change due to the proposed location for SetProcessingMode(), but, well, if I'm in minority that's fine by me. -- Michael