Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE from enable_self_join_elimination
- 717d0e8dd945 18.0 landed
-
Put enable_self_join_elimination into postgresql.conf.sample
- c2d329260cd8 18.0 landed
-
Get rid of ojrelid local variable in remove_rel_from_query()
- e167191dc146 18.0 landed
-
Implement Self-Join Elimination
- fc069a3a6319 18.0 cited
-
Revert: Remove useless self-joins
- d1d286d83c0e 17.0 landed
-
Replace lateral references to removed rels in subqueries
- 466979ef031a 17.0 landed
-
Replace relids in lateral subquery parse tree during SJE
- 489072ab7a9e 17.0 landed
-
Forbid SJE with result relation
- 8c441c082797 17.0 landed
-
Fix misuse of RelOptInfo.unique_for_rels cache by SJE
- 30b4955a4668 17.0 landed
-
Replace the relid in some missing fields during SJE
- a7928a57b9f0 17.0 landed
-
Revert 56-bit relfilenode change and follow-up commits.
- a448e49bcbe4 16.0 cited
-
Stabilize timetz test across DST transitions.
- 4a071afbd056 14.0 cited
-
Speed up finding EquivalenceClasses for a given set of rels
- 3373c7155350 13.0 cited
-
Fix mark-and-restore-skipping test case to not be a self-join.
- 24d08f3c0a1f 12.0 landed
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 08:54:55AM +0200, Andrei Lepikhov wrote: > Before diving into the pg_hint_plan code, I wonder why you don't have > similar issues with the remove_useless_joins. We intentionally designed SJE > coupled with the left-join removal feature to avoid such type of complaints: > > CREATE TABLE test (x integer PRIMARY KEY); > EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) > SELECT t1.* FROM test t1 LEFT JOIN test t2 ON (t1.x=t2.x); > > /* > QUERY PLAN > --------------------- > Seq Scan on test t1 > (1 row) > */ > > It seems that this join removal is also beyond the pg_hint_plan control ... Yeah, remove_useless_joins() has been around since the 9.0 ages as far as I know, and it's not bothered the module much in the tests because we have unlikely relied on it. For now the trick I am going to rely on is just disable enable_self_join_elimination in the test paths where I rely on the same relation and self joins to keep the plans of the regression tests stable. This stuff could create separate relations, but then with back-patching in mind that's going to be just extra conflict noise, which is always annoying when dealing with plan outputs. We've done that in the past with max_parallel_workers_per_gather or jit, to keep the expected plans stable. The point regarding the search join hook may stand, though. Perhaps somebody should check if we're still OK with this change in the context of the self-join work. I tend to think that we are and I agree that removing the joins when calling the hook can show benefits, but it may be surprising and users tend to be very noisy with plan stability, particularly if some of the FROM aliases get silenced by the backend without the module knowing about that. At least there is the trick with SET enable_self_join_elimination available as a last resort method. -- Michael