Re: Improve explicit cursor handling in pg_stat_statements
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-06-05T01:00:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:51:56AM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote: >> An enum would shine here IMO, because the value could be >> self-documented and one would not need to guess what each integer >> value means. That could be something like a direction_keyword, filled >> with FETCH_KEYWORD_LAST, FETCH_KEYWORD_BACKWARD, etc. > > Done in v4. Mostly good here, some more comments. + * If an direction_keyword (i.e., FETCH FORWARD) is used, set this field + * to distinguish it from its numeric counterpart (i.e., FETCH 1). This + * value is set only within gram.y. One nitpick comment here is that I would have mentioned that this matters for query jumbling. The tests can be in cursors.sql and not utility.sql, which is the test area for... Cursors. :D FetchDirectionKeywords could be in typedefs.list to avoid the indentation accident with the structure definition. There's no actual practice about that for committers, this note will just serve as a self-reminder once the v19 branch opens for business when I handle this patch. -- Michael
Commits
-
Show sizes of FETCH queries as constants in pg_stat_statements
- bee23ea4ddc4 19 (unreleased) landed