Re: queryId constant squashing does not support prepared statements
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Cc: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-05-08T05:22:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix typo in comment
- a3994ec6acb2 18.0 landed
-
Make query jumbling also squash PARAM_EXTERN params
- c2da1a5d6325 18.0 landed
-
Fix squashing algorithm for query texts
- 0f65f3eec478 18.0 landed
-
pg_stat_statements: Fix parameter number gaps in normalized queries
- 3c03b8cd7979 13.22 landed
- 8a1459f62ad1 14.19 landed
- 130300a15407 15.14 landed
- 7e8b44f4e0e6 16.10 landed
- 290e8ab32ac5 17.6 landed
- 35a428f30b15 18.0 landed
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 10:41:22AM +0200, Dmitry Dolgov wrote: > Ah, I see what you mean. I think the idea is fine, it will simplify > certain things as well as address the issue. But I'm afraid adding > start/end location to A_Expr is a bit too invasive, as it's being used > for many other purposes. How about introducing a new expression for this > purposes, and use it only in in_expr/array_expr, and wrap the > corresponding expressions into it? This way the change could be applied > in a more targeted fashion. Yes, that feels invasive. The use of two static variables to track the start and the end positions in an expression list can also be a bit unstable to rely on, I think. It seems to me that this part could be handled in a new Node that takes care of tracking the two positions, instead, be it a start/end couple or a location/length couple? That seems necessary to have when going through jumbleElements(). -- Michael