Re: TRAP: failed Assert("outerPlan != NULL") in postgres_fdw.c
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>, kristianlejao@gmail.com
Date: 2025-09-24T23:14:46Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix EvalPlanQual handling of foreign/custom joins in ExecScanFetch.
- 24e74b9621e4 14.20 landed
- 12b0c0e51b2f 13.23 landed
- 4a08603a2322 15.15 landed
- 5a9af48689dc 16.11 landed
- 2bb84ea7ef89 17.7 landed
- b14144325984 18.1 landed
- 12609fbacb00 19 (unreleased) landed
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 09:45:26AM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 3:28 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote: >> I took a quick glance at the patch. My initial comment is: it only >> includes the test case discussed here, but I think it's a good idea to >> add more cases in it (that exercise code paths in >> postgresRecheckForeignScan), as I mentioned upthread. What do you >> think about that? If no objections, I'd like to update it to include >> such cases. > > +1 to add more test cases for the code paths in postgresRecheckForeignScan. +1. Would these be included in the same isolation test? That may be cleaner, especially as it seems like the EPQ re-evaluations should be able to happen with the same schema as the one set up by the test. -- Michael