Re: [BUG]: the walsender does not update its IO statistics until it exits
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-09-30T07:37:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 07:14:14AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:09:46PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Agreed that something in the lines of non-transaction update of the >> entries could be adapted in some cases, so +1 for the idea. I suspect >> that there would be cases where a single stats kind should be able to >> handle both transactional and non-transactional flush cases. >> Splitting that across two stats kinds would lead to a lot of >> duplication. > > One option could be to use 2 pending lists for the variables stats and 2 flush > callbacks for fixed stats. Thoughts? Hmm. I would have thought first about one pending area, and two callbacks for the variable-sized stats, called with a different timing because the stats to be flushed are the same aren't they? For example, if we are in a long analytical query, we would flush the IO stats periodically, reset the pending data, repeat/rinse periodically, and do a last round when we are done with the query in postgres.c. Do we really need a second callback by the way? It could be as well the same flush callback, with an option to mark stats kinds that allow a periodic flush. The trick is knowing where the new reports calls should happen. The executor is the primary target area. Or perhaps you think that the pending data of a stats kind could be different if a kind allows transactional and non-transactional flushes? -- Michael
Commits
-
Flush the IO statistics of active WAL senders more frequently
- e2a82cd23a88 16.9 landed
- 5cbbe70a9cc6 17.5 landed
- 039549d70f6a 18.0 landed
-
Optimize check for pending backend IO stats
- 6d3ea48ff1ae 18.0 landed