Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
From: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>, Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com>,
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org,
Atsushi Torikoshi <torikoshia.tech@gmail.com>, samimseih@gmail.com,
destrex271@gmail.com
Date: 2026-06-25T10:33:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 25/06/2026 11:43, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 10:35 AM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote: >> 1. pg_log_query_plan - This function just sends a signal. There are no >> guarantees that actual action will be performed. So, the 'request' word makes >> more sense for me. > > I don't agree with this particular comment. Of course nothing is > absolutely guaranteed because the database system could crash or the > world could end, but if the target backend is running a query, it > should log the query plan. Therefore, I don't see the need for a word > like "request". > Ok, so just mention this behaviour in the documentation - let people know that they should potentially wait for a minute or two more to see the EXPLAIN. Real-life with huge queries and big machines provide us with examples where a backend might delay a response to a signal for quite a substantial time. Sometimes nothing happens after such an async operation, and we need to identify the problem: has the backend stalled, is the ‘logging plan’ algorithm ineffective, or is something else happening? -- regards, Andrei Lepikhov, pgEdge
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
ecpg: Catch zero-length Unicode identifiers correctly
- a18b6d2dc288 15.0 cited
-
Improve warning message in pg_signal_backend()
- 7fa945b857cc 15.0 cited
-
Add assert to ensure that page locks don't participate in deadlock cycle.
- 72e78d831ab5 13.0 cited