Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?

On Thu, 2026-02-12 at 03:06 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 7:52 PM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
> wrote:
> > Thank you for the report. I find it is quite useful, especially the
> > Emacs 23 internal (new to me). I agree that MULE_INTERNAL has
> > fulfilled its historic role.
> 
> Thanks Ishii-san and Tom.  Here's a patch.  Obviously it mostly just
> deletes thousands of lines, but also: I had to preserve the encoding
> number, so there's a hole in the table, 

pg_upgrade fails:

  Performing Upgrade
  ------------------
  ...
  Setting frozenxid and minmxid counters in new cluster        
connection to server on socket "/.../.s.PGSQL.50432" failed: FATAL: 
invalid database encoding: 7

You should have an explicit check.

Other than that, it looks good to me.

> and I had to think of a new
> name for cyrillic_and_mic.c, so I went with cyrillic.c because it
> handles 4 single-byte encodings and it wasn't clear how to fit into
> the existing x_and_y pattern (ie which two to highlight arbitrarily
> in
> the name).

Seems fine.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis