Re: Sequence Access Methods, round two
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-01-18T15:05:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Refactor init_params() in sequence.c to not use FormData_pg_sequence_data
- ba3d93b2e806 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix comment thinko in sequence.c
- 17a3f79f812c 17.0 landed
-
Group more closely cache updates for backends in sequence.c
- 6e951bf98e2e 17.0 landed
-
Introduce sequence_*() access functions
- 449e798c77ed 17.0 landed
On 01.12.23 06:00, Michael Paquier wrote: > Please find attached a patch set that aims at implementing sequence > access methods, with callbacks following a model close to table and > index AMs, with a few cases in mind: > - Global sequences (including range-allocation, local caching). > - Local custom computations (a-la-snowflake). That's a lot of code, but the use cases are summarized in two lines?!? I would like to see a lot more elaboration what these uses cases are (I recognize the words, but do we have the same interpretation of them?) and how they would be addressed by what you are proposing, and better yet an actual implementation of something useful, rather than just a dummy test module.