Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>, Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run@gmail.com>, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>, Srinath Reddy <srinath2133@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-03-11T22:37:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add non-text output formats to pg_dumpall
- 763aaa06f034 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve pg_dump/pg_dumpall help synopses and terminology
- dec6643487bb 18.0 cited
-
Non text modes for pg_dumpall, correspondingly change pg_restore
- 1495eff7bdb0 18.0 landed
-
Doc: manually break lines in wide UUID examples.
- a6524105d20b 18.0 cited
On 2025-03-11 Tu 5:03 PM, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2025-Mar-11, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> I'm not sure everyone thinks that was a good idea for backup manifests (in >> fact I know some don't), and it seems somewhat like overkill for a simple >> map of oids to database names. > If such a simple system can be made to work for all possible valid > database names, then I agree with you. But if it forces us to restrict > database names to not contain newlines or other funny chars that are so > far unrestricted, then I would take the other position. > Well, JSON is supposed to be UTF8. What should we do about database names that are not UTF8? It's kinda tempting to say we should have the file consist of lines like: oid base64_encoded_name escaped_human_readable name cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com