Horton

Re: block-level incremental backup

Artur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>

View thread
From: Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-04-09T16:32:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Don't call data type input functions in GUC check hooks

Hello,

On 09.04.2019 18:48, Robert Haas wrote:
> - It would also be nice if pg_basebackup could write backups to places
> other than the local disk, like an object store, a tape drive, etc.
> But that also sounds like a separate effort.
> 
> Thoughts? 

(Just thinking out loud) Also it might be useful to have remote restore 
facility (i.e. if pg_combinebackup could write to non-local storage), so 
you don't need to restore the instance into a locale place and copy/move 
to the remote machine. But it seems to me that it is the most nontrivial 
feature and requires much more effort than other points.

In pg_probackup we have remote restore via SSH in the beta state. But 
SSH isn't an option for in-core approach I think.

-- 
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company