Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0

Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-15T07:26:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2025-03-14 at 23:54 -0700, Jeremy Schneider wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2025 13:11:18 -0800
> It seems the consensus is to update unicode in core... FWIW, I'm still
> in favor of leaving it alone because ICU is there for when I need
> up-to-date unicode versions.

Me too.

> From my perspective, the whole point of the builtin collation was to
> one option that avoids these problems that come with updating both ICU
> and glibc.

+1

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



Commits

  1. pg_upgrade: Fix memory leak in check_for_unicode_update().

  2. pg_upgrade check for Unicode-dependent relations.

  3. Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0