Re: REINDEX SCHEMA/DATABASE/SYSTEM weak with dropped relations

On 01.09.2020 04:38, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have added some extra comments.  There is one in
> ReindexRelationConcurrently() to mention that there should be no extra
> use of MISSING_OK once the list of indexes is built as session locks
> are taken where needed.
Great, it took me a moment to understand the logic around index list 
check at first pass.
> Does the version attached look fine to you?  I have done one round of
> indentation while on it.

Yes, this version is good.

-- 
Anastasia Lubennikova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company