Re: sunsetting md5 password support

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2024-10-10T21:45:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 11/10/2024 00:03, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Oct  9, 2024 at 10:30:15PM +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 21:55, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> In this message, I propose a multi-year, incremental approach to remove MD5
>>> password support from Postgres.
>>
>> +many for the general idea
>>
>> I think it makes sense to also remove the "password" authentication
>> option while we're at it (this can currently be used with SCRAM stored
>> passwords).
> 
> I remember "password" as being recommended for SSL connections where
> there is no risk of the password contents being seen.

I wouldn't recommend it if SCRAM is available, but yeah, with TLS and 
sslmode=verify-full, it's secure enough.

Note that some authentication methods like LDAP and Radius use 
"password" authentication on the wire.

-- 
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)




Commits

  1. Deprecate MD5 passwords.