Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Reduce the log level in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl.
- 3034dc56ef4b 16.0 landed
-
035_standby_logical_decoding: Add missing waits for replication
- 57411c82ce86 16.0 landed
-
For cascading replication, wake physical and logical walsenders separately
- e101dfac3a53 16.0 landed
-
Handle logical slot conflicts on standby
- 26669757b6a7 16.0 landed
-
Support invalidating replication slots due to horizon and wal_level
- be87200efd93 16.0 landed
-
Prevent use of invalidated logical slot in CreateDecodingContext()
- 4397abd0a2af 16.0 landed
-
Replace replication slot's invalidated_at LSN with an enum
- 15f8203a5975 16.0 landed
-
Pass down table relation into more index relation functions
- 61b313e47eb9 16.0 landed
-
Assert only valid flag bits are passed to visibilitymap_set()
- a88a18b1250b 16.0 landed
-
Remove unused _bt_delitems_delete() argument.
- dc43492e46c7 14.0 cited
-
Add xl_btree_delete optimization.
- d2e5e20e5711 13.0 cited
Attachments
- v34-0006-Fixing-Walsender-corner-case-with-logical-decodi.patch (text/plain) patch v34-0006
- v34-0005-Doc-changes-describing-details-about-logical-dec.patch (text/plain) patch v34-0005
- v34-0004-New-TAP-test-for-logical-decoding-on-standby.patch (text/plain) patch v34-0004
- v34-0003-Allow-logical-decoding-on-standby.patch (text/plain) patch v34-0003
- v34-0002-Handle-logical-slot-conflicts-on-standby.patch (text/plain) patch v34-0002
- v34-0001-Add-info-in-WAL-records-in-preparation-for-logic.patch (text/plain) patch v34-0001
Hi, On 12/20/22 7:31 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 1:19 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >> I don't understand what the "may*" or "*Possible" really are >> about. snapshotConflictHorizon is a conflict with a certain xid - there >> commonly won't be anything to conflict with. If there's a conflict in >> the logical-decoding-on-standby case, we won't be able to apply it only >> sometimes or such. > > The way I was imagining it is that snapshotConflictHorizon tells us > whether there is a conflict with this record and then, if there is, > this new Boolean tells us whether it's relevant to logical decoding as > well. > the "may*" or "*Possible" was, most probably, because I preferred to have the uncertainty of the conflict mentioned in the name. But, somehow, I was forgetting about the relationship with snapshotConflictHorizon. So, agree with both of you that mentioning about the uncertainty of the conflict is useless. >> How about "affectsLogicalDecoding", "conflictsWithSlots" or >> "isCatalogRel" or such? > > isCatalogRel seems fine to me. For me too, please find attached v34 using it. Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com