Re: Consistently use palloc_object() and palloc_array()

David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>

From: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>
To: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-28T21:06:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. btree_gist: Fix memory allocation formula

  2. Use palloc_object() and palloc_array(), the last change

  3. pg_buffercache: Fix memory allocation formula

  4. Fix allocation formula in llvmjit_expr.c

  5. Use palloc_object() and palloc_array() in backend code

  6. Use palloc_object() and palloc_array() in more areas of the tree

  7. Use more palloc_object() and palloc_array() in contrib/

Hi!

Thanks for taking a look.

On 27.11.2025 00:03, Chao Li wrote:
> 
> This is a large patch, I just take a quick look, and found that:
> 
> ```
> -		*phoned_word = palloc(sizeof(char) * strlen(word) + 1);
> +		*phoned_word = palloc_array(char, strlen(word) + 1);
> ```
> 
> And
> 
> ```
> -		params = (const char **) palloc(sizeof(char *));
> +		params = palloc_object(const char *);
> ```
> 
> Applying palloc_array and palloc_object to char type doesn’t seem to improve anything.
> 

You mean because sizeof(char) is always 1 and hence we could instead
simply write:

*phoned_word = palloc(strlen(word) + 1);
params = palloc(1);

I think the _array and _object variants are more expressive and for sure
don't make the code less readable.

--
David Geier