Re: race condition in pg_class

Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Smolkin Grigory <smallkeen@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Date: 2024-07-03T03:00:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Replace tests of ALTER DATABASE RESET TABLESPACE.

  2. meson: Flush stdout in testwrap

  3. Fix catcache invalidation of a list entry that's being built

  4. Stop reading uninitialized memory in heap_inplace_lock().

  5. Fix use of uninitialized value in previous commit.

  6. Back-patch "Refactor code in tablecmds.c to check and process tablespace moves"

  7. Fix data loss at inplace update after heap_update().

  8. For inplace update durability, make heap_update() callers wait.

  9. Warn if LOCKTAG_TUPLE is held at commit, under debug_assertions.

  10. Don't lose partitioned table reltuples=0 after relhassubclass=f.

  11. Fix new assertion for MERGE view_name ... DO NOTHING.

  12. Remove configuration-dependent output from new inplace-inval test.

  13. AccessExclusiveLock new relations just after assigning the OID.

  14. Cope with inplace update making catcache stale during TOAST fetch.

  15. Expand comments and add an assertion in nodeModifyTable.c.

  16. Improve test coverage for changes to inplace-updated catalogs.

  17. Lock before setting relhassubclass on RELKIND_PARTITIONED_INDEX.

  18. Lock owned sequences during ALTER TABLE SET { LOGGED | UNLOGGED }.

  19. Make TAP todo_start effects the same under Meson and prove_check.

  20. Add an injection_points isolation test suite.

  21. Add wait event type "InjectionPoint", a custom type like "Extension".

  22. Create waitfuncs.c for pg_isolation_test_session_is_blocked().

  23. Rework planning and execution of UPDATE and DELETE.

Hello Noah,

29.06.2024 05:42, Noah Misch wrote:
> Good point, any effort on (2) would be wasted once the fixes get certified.  I
> pushed (1).  I'm attaching the rebased fix patches.

Please look at a new anomaly, introduced by inplace110-successors-v5.patch:
CREATE TABLE t (i int) PARTITION BY LIST(i);
CREATE TABLE p1 (i int);
ALTER TABLE t ATTACH PARTITION p1 FOR VALUES IN (1);
ALTER TABLE t DETACH PARTITION p1;
ANALYZE t;

triggers unexpected
ERROR:  tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command

Best regards,
Alexander