Re: Proposal: roll pg_stat_statements into core
Adrien Nayrat <adrien.nayrat@anayrat.info>
From: Adrien Nayrat <adrien.nayrat@anayrat.info>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-09-02T08:11:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 9/1/19 8:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> - The overhead for most use cases is low compared to the benefit. > Please do not expect that we're going to accept such assertions > unsupported by evidence. (As a very quick-n-dirty test, I tried > "pgbench -S" and got somewhere around 4% TPS degradation with > pg_stat_statements loaded. That doesn't seem negligible.) AFAIR Andres pointed overhead could be much more when you have more queries than pg_stat_statements.max [1]. Eviction can be costly. 1: https://twitter.com/AndresFreundTec/status/1105585237772263424