Re: Adding basic NUMA awareness - Preliminary feedback and outline for an extensible approach
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain@data-bene.io>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-07-07T23:25:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On 2025-07-05 07:09:00 +0000, Cédric Villemain wrote: > In my work on more careful PostgreSQL resource management, I've come to the > conclusion that we should avoid pushing policy too deeply into the > PostgreSQL core itself. Therefore, I'm quite skeptical about integrating > NUMA-specific management directly into core PostgreSQL in such a way. I think it's actually the opposite - whenever we pushed stuff like this outside of core it has hurt postgres substantially. Not having replication in core was a huge mistake. Not having HA management in core is probably the biggest current adoption hurdle for postgres. To deal better with NUMA we need to improve memory placement and various algorithms, in an interrelated way - that's pretty much impossible to do outside of core. Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Sort guc_parameters.dat alphabetically by name
- fce7c73fba4e 19 (unreleased) cited