Re: Low Performance for big hospital server ..
William Yu <wyu@talisys.com>
From: William Yu <wyu@talisys.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-01-03T19:57:50Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Dave Cramer wrote: > > > William Yu wrote: > >> amrit@health2.moph.go.th wrote: >> >>> I will try to reduce shared buffer to 1536 [1.87 Mb]. >> >> >> >> 1536 is probaby too low. I've tested a bunch of different settings on >> my 8GB Opteron server and 10K seems to be the best setting. > > > Be careful here, he is not using opterons which can access physical > memory above 4G efficiently. Also he only has 4G the 6-10% rule still > applies 10% of 4GB is 400MB. 10K buffers is 80MB. Easily less than the 6-10% rule. >> To figure out your effective cache size, run top and add free+cached. > > > My understanding is that effective cache is the sum of shared buffers, > plus kernel buffers, not sure what free + cached gives you? Not true. Effective cache size is the free memory available that the OS can use for caching for Postgres. In a system that runs nothing but Postgres, it's free + cached.