Re: initdb when data/ folder has mount points
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
To: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-02-22T00:56:38Z
Lists: pgsql-general
On 2/21/18 7:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes: >> Apparently, initdb assumes that data/ is one big mount point. However, we >> have four mount points: >> /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/backup >> /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/base >> /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/pg_log >> /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/pg_xlog > > Don't do that. Agreed. > There's no reason for backup storage to be under the data directory (and > lots of good reasons for it not to be). Just put it somewhere else. Yes -- in this configuration your backups would be backed up with every backup. It's pretty obvious where that would go. > The supported way to put pg_xlog on a separate volume is to put that > mount point somewhere else, and make $PGDATA/pg_xlog be a symlink to > it. IIRC, there's an initdb option to help with that, though you can > also make it so manually after initdb. initdb supports linking pg_xlog/pg_wal with the --xlogdir/--waldir option. > For pg_log, just put it somewhere else and set the appropriate > configuration option to say where to write the postmaster log files. > Or you could use a symlink, like the solution for pg_xlog, but > I don't see any advantage there. Symlinking pg_log is not ideal because the logs end up in the backup. It gets pretty weird when those logs get restored to a standby and somebody starts reading them. > I don't see any point in making base/ be its own mount point. Once > you get rid of those other subdirectories there's not going to be > enough "global" storage left to justify its own volume. Agreed. -- -David david@pgmasters.net